Islamic economic sabotage

Paing dangerous threat with the development of Islamic economics is that when associated with religious fanaticism. They do not like not because of the system, but merely did not want people rise from economic backwardness.

American invasion and its allies in Afghanistan (which continue in 2003 with a pounding awaal iraq) reminds us of the thesis of Samuel Huntington, the clash of civilization or clash of civilizations (1993). Differences in carrying American capitalism as the jargon of life has indeed been menganvasknan communism. But, with the demise of communism, the true enemy of the other U.S. born: Islam and Confucianism as a symbol of strength from the east come into being.

Many academics are correct and hard menegeritik culture clash as exceeds exaggerated. But we look at here, one of the important pillars of economic support each beradaban, never seemed in discussing. Is there a conflict between western and eastern economies? more strongly again between America and Islam.
If listening to a variety of economic cooperation, both asia pacific economic cooperation forum (APEC), the world trade organization (WTO), kawassan North American free trade (NAFTA), the Southeast Asian free trade area (AFTA), all pursed in communally shared the same desire to raise economic power both regionally and internationally to meet the competition. Those who want to join it in the isolate and condemned as the State did not want to get a blessing from the trade.
On the pretext of it, big countries that are ready to compete, forcing developing countries to liberalize trade. Concretely, the State Small Countries including Indonesia as the globalization of trade rules must be free of import duty to zero percent when his moment arrives. His ways, although for certain products, such as agriculture, we are not ready, the government agreed only. That farmers most threatened in this matter, it's about later.
Various forms of trade cooperation implies that almost no opposition. It was just incredible dominance in the economy. Base of dominance again, who else but the United States. U.S. dollar which has been a hard hard currency the world has become a symbol of American economic superiority, and as usual, the superiority was always tempting owners to play a role that is sometimes excessive and unfair.
At that time, George bush to announce all the assets which it called terrorist destruction of the WTC. Interestingly, some countries which claim to be the right of democracy and justice, it is done without the need to prove its truth. Bush lightly freeze because of all the dollar-denominated assets.
The one in my worry, to khalapan would also be transmitted in 'hatred' would be the economic revival of Islam. Because for most of western society, with the Arab Islamic identity. The percentage of long history and injuries due to the crusade. Violence in munculkan through acts of terror that gave birth to terrorism.

If it happens, the financial institution perisnsip yng bring sharia, can only reap the sap. Just who in the memory by sharia economics expert, Dr. Karnaen, the most dangerous threat to the development of Islamic economics is that if the link denganpanatisme religion. There will be parties do not like Islamic economics, not because the system was a blessing but did not want people rise from the economic backwardness ... .. whether they enter this category? wasalam